WCLO Stan Milam Show, Wisconsin, Interviews Dr. K

Ideas. Insight. Inspiration.

WCLO Stan Milam Show, Wisconsin, Interviews Dr. K

November 7, 2008 Politics 3

I did a wide ranging interview on politics this morning with Stan Milam, on 1230 am WCLO Radio out of Wisconsin, talking about negative ads in this political cycle and the impact they had on voters.  

Stan raised the question of polls and the role they played in this election.  He asked if they had proven themselves accurate, and wondered why there had been so much hand wringing about them this time around.  I think people were worried that the polls wouldn’t be reflected in the election results because of the questionable results in the two previous national contests.  Most people I know were skeptical specifically because of how contested the last two elections turned out.  The fact is that in both those elections, the polls were pretty darn close for the most part.  But it’s the internet where the contest has gone.  I think that the online aggregators of polls proved themselves to be remarkably effective. Stan wondered how, in light of the fact that many young voters don’t have land lines, and pollsters poll over land lines, how could the polls have come so close to predicting the election outcome.   My response is that parents must have been listening to their kids, and voted accordingly.  That’s the only way it makes sense to me.

Stan asked me if I thought that Obama is Kennedy-esqe.  I see 5 parallels.  The fact that the Kennedys have all given Barack their collective thumbs up, makes it hard NOT to draw parallels. 

1. Obama’s age and family situation are a match.   Young families will look to the first family as a role model, and this family has a lot to offer in that regard.  There’s two cute kids who we will, no doubt, be seeing plenty of – their new puppy will be our national puppy, and we’ll get to see them playing in the White House, playing in the Rose Garden, and growing up before our collective eyes.  The kids, Malia (8 years old) and Sasha (5 years old)  appear to have great personality and seem like genuinely happy kids with expressive faces.  Kids are going to like them, and you just know they’ll have celebrity attention for Obama’s entire turn in office.  Everything they do, other kids will do or want to do. What they like, other kids will like.  Put it all together and everything this family likes, other families will like.  To the degree that Obama fulfills his promise and lives up to his potential, he’ll be popular, and this first family will be at the center of our national hopes and dreams. 

2.  Like Jackie, Michelle Obama is really smart, and carries herself with dignity and sense.  Jackie’s sense of self combined with her sense of style gave the women of America something to obsess over. I recall from that time that women dressed like Jackie or Marilyn, but mostly Jackie.  I suspect that will repeat here.  Michelle has an unpretentious sense of style, just like Jackie. She likes pearls, same as Jackie. Hairstyle, similar to Jackie’s.  When Barack and Michelle are together, they seem right somehow, just like Jack and Jackie.  Michelle, who is accomplished and capable, sees her primary role as mother to the kids. Just like Jackie.   Michelle must know about all the potential for comparison.  Seems to me that she models herself on Jackie, a smart choice, and a natural choice.  

3.  Obama has rallied the youth in this country, as did JFK. A wave of young energy carried this unlikely candidate all the way to the Presidency.  That’s a powerful generational connection.  Young people have the biggest investment in the future, too.  They are having their kids now.  This is their time, and they are media savvy.  This means that Obama’s time in office will be focused on harnessing and utilizing that spirit and energy in service to the common good.  

4.  JFK carried himself with authority and calm, and his face and smile gave jittery people some reassurance that everything was under control.  Obama has that same calm charisma.  He moves with apparent ease, clearly comfortable in his body. That invokes confidence in people that watch him.  Looking at pictures of him with his family on election night, as John McCain gave his concession speech, it is obvious that Obama knows the times are perilous, the challenges are great, and commitment more important than euphoria.  This level headedness will hopefully serve him well.  

5. Lastly, JFK had a gift for giving a powerful speech, as does Obama.  Though I’m stumped sometimes at the rhetoric used to describe his speaking ability – Obama hems and haws often –  he does know how to build a speech, organize it around a consistent theme and deliver it with the rhetorical flourishes (these are the delivery guides I refer to in the ‘Insider’s Guide’) that make powerful ideas easy for listeners to digest.

Stan asked me at the end of the interview to summarize my opinion about the future of negative advertising.  I hated saying it out loud, but I have no doubt that we’ve not seen the last of it.  I’m guessing it will be 10 to 20 years before politicians and their handlers finally figure out just how self defeating they are in a country that wants to better itself.  

Stan mentioned that the old approach was to play up the other campaign’s negatives while holding steady at whatever popularity you have.  He asked my why I don’t think it worked for McCain, or worked very well in so many of the other contests that took place.  Elizabeth Dole sunk to a new low in trying to make the case that her opponent was ‘God-less,’ and Gordon Smith in my state tried to cast his democratic opponent Jeff Merkeley using creepy videos with whispered scares.  Something has changed. Why? Because everyone was already dealing with depression, worry and fear.  Last thing they’d want or need is someone trying to make them even more depressed, worried and scared.  And there is steady at the wheel Obama, offering hope and talking about the future.  That’s what the electorate needed.  That was McCain’s chance to win. To do the same with his campaign.  It would have been magnificent.  It would changed our country in and of itself. 

Negative ads backfired because they push people to their threshold for negativity.  From there all that remains is despair. No right minded person wants to go there.  If you want to win an election in this kind of environment – one that is likely to last awhile – that’s no way to win friends and influence voters. An entire generation now feels a sense of ownership over the future.  They recognize our potential to  involved (educated, worldly, and rightly concerned about their future) are now so involved in the political process that the more pressing issue from this point on is going to be where do we go from here.  Unless the Republicans abandon the Rove playbook (which was a masterful deconstruction of how politicks worked in the 20th century) and come up with an identity that speaks to the younger crowd, they will marginalize themselves completely. 

We’ve got some gigantic problems facing us as a nation.  The next few years are likely to be more uncomfortable and challenging than anything we’ve experienced in a very long time. I’ve heard a lot of talk about the ‘end of the American empire.’  But the rumors of our fall from grace have been greatly exaggerated.  Finally, we have a President who seems willing to bite the bullet (Reagan did this too) and face up to our problems instead of giving them lip service while continuing blithely on.  With steady leadership and bright minds working together for our good, I have the sense that we’re going to be ok after all.   

I think we’re about to witness an actual rebirth of American idealism that will propel us into this still-new century at what could be an absolutely amazing pace of change and innovation.  Yes, the world still has its nutjobs and self-destructive fools wishing to take us all down into their personal hells with them. Obama says they will be defeated.  If that’s so, I see more promise, more potential and more opportunity for positive change than I’ve ever seen in my lifetime.  I’m personally eager to find ways to participate, and from what I can tell, that’s a feeling common amongst people wherever I go.  

You can hear the interview here:

Stan Milam Show

Back next week.  Have a hope filled weekend.  

be well

Rick

 

3 Responses

  1. […] Stan asked me at the end of the interview to summarize my opinion about the future of negative advertising. Read more […]

    [WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment’s server IP (74.220.215.249) doesn’t match the comment’s URL host IP () and so is spam.

  2. J.D. Meier says:

    Hey Dr. K

    I agree on the power of positivity. I like your phrase –calm charisma.

    In the past, I used to think it was more about the issues. Now, I really see it’s about e vision over a plan, opportunity focus over blame, and positive messages over mud slinging.

    Hemming and hawing probably helps with the human side and down to earth aspect.

    • J.D.

      In times of severe crisis, where uncertainty overtakes all other considerations, people want and choose leadership over management, so campaigns have to be about values and provide vision. Mudslinging, or running against, is what you do when you have nothing to run for or about. And I’m thinking that voters have figured this out (well, not yet in Oklahoma and a few other places, but in general)

      I do like the way he sputters before talking, because it does humanize him. That calm he has, it’s very Hawaiian I think, like the surfer that deals with adversity with ‘acknowledge, move on’ kind of a mindset.

      Thanks for your comments, they are always appreciated.
      Rick

Comments are closed.